Showing posts with label socialist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label socialist. Show all posts

Friday, May 22, 2020

№ 862: Meditations (mark of a realist)

RECKONING (May 21) —
Marcus Aurelius
Jesus was a Socialist.
Giving out free bread and wine?
And his “business” (Jay's Loaves and Fishes?)
never collecting a nickel or dime?


Had Jesus been an entrepreneur,
charging full freight for his services,
then, perhaps, the Sanhedrin and Romans
would not have gotten nearly as nervous.


Had Jesus been a go-along guy,
rendered Cæsar — completely! — his due,
then, perhaps, Pilate would have ignored
the unfortunate fact of his being . . . a Jew.
His coreligionists could have found common ground,
had he, instead of clearing the temple,
spread a peck of shekels around.
(And been a little less temperamental.)


Had Jesus struck a truce with Zeus — 
that guy the Romans called Jupiter — 
would history have taken a different course,
maybe have been a little less stupider?


Nah. Who am I kidding? What are the odds
that there could ever be peaceable gods?
Gods we created in our own image, 
who therefore exculpate our violentest scrimmages
with winners and losers, with vics and perps.
Exacerbate everything. Give 'em the works!
Slings! Arrows! Outrageous fortune!
Ain't no such a thing as out-of-proportion.


We are who we are. We get what we get.
I find it astounding we ain't over. (Yet.)

Wednesday, September 4, 2019

№ 675: Bothers Grim

ASITWASINTHEBEGINNING (September 2)

Life, by nature,
is, at base, brutal.
Nature, herself, is
essentially feudal.
The strongest survive,
the weakest perish.
That is the formula
Mother N cherishes.
Socialist hopefuls
achieving power,
give up the share thing
within the hour.
On the other hand,
Ayn Rand Libertarians
believe she rewards
their grand plans vulgarian.
However, they quickly retreat
in defeat.
Mediocrity cannot
pass for elite.

Thursday, May 10, 2018

№ 331: The Blightests And The Beasts

The thing that sets Dunning-Krugers apart:
the mistaken conviction that they're “very smart”.
If they ever heard of them they would disparage
the studies that show they are below average.
Can you say “Punch”? Can you say “Judy”?
Can you say “Trump”? Can you say “Rudy”?
When I think Dunning-Kruger those two of a kind
spring to mind
along with Sanders' “Socialists” and Rand's “Libertarians”.
(Mom said I tended contrarian.)